A 4-phase framework for redesigning a website without losing what works. Content audit, information architecture, SEO strategy, and AEO/GEO — in order, with deliverables defined at each phase.
Built from a real client engagement. Anonymized and templatized so you can adapt it to any site, any industry, any CMS.
Before you redesign anything, understand what you have. Pull every page into a structured inventory. Audit each one for accuracy, relevance, and audience fit. Flag problems as you go — don’t fix them yet.
For every page, assign one of five actions:
Keep — content is accurate and serves a user journey.
Rename — content is fine, but the title doesn’t match search intent.
Merge — thin page that belongs inside another.
Remove — outdated, redundant, or serving no audience.
Create — gap identified from competitive analysis.
The competitive gap analysis. Teams audit their own pages but never check what their competitors have that they don’t. You’ll find 5-10 pages you should have — FAQ pages, comparison pages, program-specific landing pages — that your competitors already rank for.
Now organize what you’ve audited. Map the current structure, propose the new one, and define 6-8 user journeys that dictate how people actually move through the site. The IA should flow from user needs, not your org chart.
Removed a dead blog — 3 posts from two years ago. Dead content hurts SEO more than no blog at all. Either commit to publishing or remove it.
Renamed “A Better Option” to “Why [Company]” — the original title was clever but didn’t match how anyone searches. Clarity beats creativity in navigation.
Merged a thin standalone page into its parent — 200 words that didn’t justify its own URL. Folded the content into the section landing page where it actually gets read.
User journey mapping. Teams redesign the sitemap based on their internal structure (“About Us,” “Services,” “Resources”) instead of how visitors actually move through the site. If a page doesn’t appear in any user journey, ask why it exists.
With the IA locked, layer on search strategy. Research keywords, write metadata, design the internal linking model, and audit competitors. Every recommendation must be implementable in your CMS — don’t prescribe what the platform can’t do.
Homepage is the primary hub. Section landing pages (Services, About, Resources) are secondary hubs. Every content page is a spoke that links back to its hub and forward to a conversion CTA. This concentrates link authority where it matters and gives search engines a clear hierarchy to crawl.
Writing actual metadata. Teams do keyword research but never write the title tags and meta descriptions. The implementer gets a keyword list and has to figure out the copy themselves. Write it for them — copy-paste ready, every page.
SEO gets you ranked on search engines. AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) get you cited in AI-generated answers. This is the layer most redesigns don’t include yet — which means it’s the one that creates the most differentiation.
AI models extract answers from your content. If your page buries the answer after three paragraphs of context, the model skips you. Lead with the concrete fact: “Class sizes average 14 students with a 10:1 student-teacher ratio” — not “We believe in the power of small, personalized learning environments.” Specific data beats narrative when the goal is getting cited.
Structured data entirely. Schema markup tells AI exactly what your organization is, what you offer, and how to cite you. Most redesigns treat it as a technical afterthought. Build the JSON-LD templates during the strategy phase so they’re ready when the site launches.
Design drift happens during the build. Pages get iterated on independently. One developer adjusts spacing on the services page while another tweaks typography on the about page. By launch day, the site looks fine page-by-page but inconsistent side-by-side.
Before you call the redesign done, run a consistency audit across every page. Here’s what to check:
Inconsistency signals sloppiness to visitors — even when they can’t name what’s wrong. A prospect who notices your heading is 2px bigger on one page won’t tell you about it. They’ll just trust you slightly less. The audit takes an hour. Skipping it costs credibility.
Understand what exists before proposing changes. Teams that skip the content audit build strategy on assumptions about their own site that turn out to be wrong.
Information architecture should follow how visitors move through your site, not how your company is organized internally. If “About Us” doesn’t appear in any user journey, reconsider whether it deserves top-level navigation.
SEO advice that your CMS can’t execute is useless. Know the platform before writing the strategy. Don’t prescribe custom schema markup if the CMS only supports basic meta tags.
SEO and AEO optimization should enhance readability, not replace the organization’s tone. Light-touch editing: add keywords where they fit naturally, restructure for clarity, but don’t rewrite copy that already sounds like the brand.
Give implementers title tags they can paste, schema they can deploy, and FAQ pages they can publish. The less interpretation required, the more likely the strategy actually ships.
PDF with all four phases, deliverable checklists, decision examples, skip callouts, and the five principles. Share it with your team or use it to scope your next redesign.
Download the PDFPDF — free, no strings
We build custom content ops pipelines, SEO automation, and AI-powered site tools for GTM teams.
Book a Discovery Call